Direct Democracy Party
Back to blog
13 May 20265 min readdemocracyexplainer

Citizens' assemblies: a complement to direct democracy

By Direct Democracy

Imagine if 99 randomly selected Australians could spend months examining climate policy, hearing from experts, deliberating together, and then making recommendations that actually shaped legislation. It sounds almost too good to be true, but citizens' assemblies are doing exactly this around the world - and they're proving to be a natural partner to direct democracy.

What are citizens' assemblies?

A citizens' assembly brings together a representative sample of ordinary people to learn about, discuss, and make recommendations on specific policy issues. Unlike focus groups or surveys, participants spend substantial time - often several weekends over months - diving deep into complex topics with expert guidance.

The process typically involves three phases: learning (hearing from experts and stakeholders), deliberating (discussing trade-offs in small groups), and deciding (reaching conclusions through structured voting). What makes assemblies special is their combination of rigorous information-gathering with genuine citizen participation.

Global success stories

Ireland's Citizens' Assembly on abortion in 2016-2017 examined one of the country's most divisive issues. After months of evidence and deliberation, the assembly recommended allowing abortion in specific circumstances. This informed a subsequent referendum where 66.4% of Irish voters chose to repeal the constitutional ban on abortion.

France has institutionalised citizens' assemblies, with President Macron committing to put assembly recommendations to either Parliament or referendum. Their Citizens' Convention on Climate brought together 150 people who proposed 149 measures to reduce emissions by 40% by 2030.

Even in Australia, we're seeing experiments. The Australian Citizens' Parliament in 2009 brought together 150 people to examine our political system. More recently, local councils have used mini-assemblies to tackle everything from budget priorities to planning decisions.

Why assemblies complement direct democracy

Critics of direct democracy often point to the complexity of modern policy issues. How can ordinary citizens make informed decisions about carbon pricing mechanisms or regulatory frameworks? Citizens' assemblies provide a compelling answer.

Assemblies create informed voters. When assembly recommendations go to broader votes, citizens have access to considered analysis from their peers who've spent months studying the issue. This is far more valuable than 30-second TV ads or partisan talking points.

They model deliberative democracy. Assembly participants consistently report changed perspectives after hearing different viewpoints. This demonstrates that given good information and respectful dialogue, citizens can grapple with complex trade-offs - exactly what direct democracy requires at scale.

They build legitimacy. Recommendations carry weight precisely because they come from ordinary citizens, not politicians or interest groups. When assembly participants reflect the broader population's demographics, their conclusions feel more legitimate than expert panels or parliamentary committees.

The Australian opportunity

Australia faces several challenges that citizens' assemblies could help address before broader democratic participation:

Constitutional reform remains stalled despite widespread agreement that change is needed. An assembly could examine specific proposals - from Indigenous recognition to updating federal-state responsibilities - building the detailed case needed for successful referendums.

Climate policy has been a political football for decades. With Australia's emissions rising 0.9% in 2025 despite our net-zero commitments, we need considered policy development that goes beyond electoral cycles.

Housing affordability affects millions of Australians, but solutions require navigating complex interactions between tax policy, planning laws, and social policy. An assembly could examine evidence on negative gearing reform, inclusionary zoning, and social housing models without the political constraints facing elected representatives.

Technology regulation - from AI governance to social media oversight - requires understanding both technical possibilities and social values. Citizens' assemblies excel at these intersections of expertise and public judgment.

Integration with participatory democracy

For Direct Democracy party members, citizens' assemblies offer a pathway to more effective member voting. Imagine assembly recommendations informing member deliberation before Direct Democracy representatives vote in Parliament.

The process might work like this: 1. Assembly formation: Citizens randomly selected to examine specific issues 2. Deliberation period: Months of evidence-gathering and discussion 3. Public recommendations: Assembly reports with detailed reasoning 4. Member engagement: Direct Democracy members use assembly findings to inform their own positions 5. Democratic instruction: Members vote on clear instructions for their representatives 6. Parliamentary action: Direct Democracy MPs follow member instructions, informed by assembly deliberation

This creates informed participation without sacrificing democratic control. Members aren't bound by assembly recommendations, but they benefit from the detailed analysis and citizen perspectives.

Making it happen

Establishing citizens' assemblies requires political will and institutional support. Other parties resist because assemblies threaten their gatekeeping role over policy development. Direct democracy offers a different path.

As Direct Democracy representation grows in parliaments across Australia, we can advocate for citizens' assemblies as standard practice for complex policy issues. Our representatives, bound by member instructions rather than party lines, can champion assembly recommendations that serve the public interest.

The combination of citizens' assemblies and direct democracy creates a powerful alternative to top-down politics. Assembly deliberation ensures quality, while direct democracy ensures democratic control.

Ready to be part of Australia's democratic future? [Take our policy quiz](https://directdemocracy.com.au/quiz) to see how your views align with our members, or [join Direct Democracy](https://directdemocracy.com.au/join) to start voting on the policies that shape our representatives' actions in Parliament.

Ready to see where you stand?